Reproductive System – Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Reproductive System Research Dashboard

449

Primary Studies

0

Related Studies

449

Total Studies

Clinical Studies

7

Clinical Meta-analyses

7

Double-blind Clinical Trials

30

Clinical Trials

Pre-Clinical Studies

222

Meta-analyses/Reviews

82

Animal Studies

101

Laboratory Studies

What am I missing as a non-subscriber?

To see a full dashboard with study details and filtering, go to our DEMO page.

As a subscriber, you will be able to access dashboard insights including chemotype overviews and dosing summaries for medical conditions and organ system and receptor breakdowns for cannabinoid and terpene searches. Study lists present important guidance including dosing and chemotype information with the ability to drill down to the published material. And all outputs are fully filterable, to help find just the information you need. Stay up-to-date with the science of cannabis and the endocannabinoid system with CannaKeys.

CannaKeys has 449 studies associated with Reproductive System.

Here is a small sampling of Reproductive System studies by title:


Components of the Reproductive System Research Dashboard

  • Medical conditions associated with Reproductive System
  • Synopsis of cannabis research for Reproductive System
  • Chemotype guidance for Reproductive System
  • Individual study details for Reproductive System

Ready to become a subscriber? Go to our PRICING page.

Select Organ System

Filter Organ System

Members can filter by the following criteria:

  • Study Type
  • Chemotype
  • Cannabinoids & Endocannabinoids
  • Terpenes
  • Receptors
  • Ligands
  • Study Result
  • Year of Publication

Overview - Reproductive System

Description of Reproductive System

If the skeletal system is our architecture and the muscular system our engine, the reproductive system is our legacy—carrying the blueprint of life forward while also shaping intimacy, pleasure, and identity in the present. It is a bridge between the deeply personal and the generational, linking the body’s internal rhythms to the continuum of human existence.


Its form varies across biological sexes. In gender-typical females, the reproductive organs include the vagina, uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries, as well as the mammary glands for nourishing offspring. The clitoris stands apart as the only known human organ devoted solely to sexual pleasure. In gender-typical males, the penis, testes, vas deferens, seminal vesicles, and prostate work together to produce, protect, and deliver sperm. Accessory glands—Bartholin’s in females, bulbourethral in males—support lubrication, fertility, and sexual comfort. In intersex individuals, reproductive anatomy may blend or diverge from these patterns, reflecting the natural diversity of human biology.


The reproductive system is deeply intertwined with the endocrine system, regulating hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone. These not only govern fertility and sexual function, but also influence mood, energy, bone density, and secondary sexual characteristics over the lifespan.


Beyond its role in reproduction, this system is a source of profound human connection. Sexual expression and intimacy can foster trust, emotional bonding, and psychological well-being, mediated in part by hormones like oxytocin and endorphins. The endocannabinoid system also plays a quiet but essential role—modulating sexual desire, arousal, and satisfaction, as well as reproductive processes such as implantation and sperm function.


 


To care for the reproductive system is to honor both the potential to create life and the capacity to deepen life’s most intimate bonds—an acknowledgment that sexuality, reproduction, and pleasure are not merely biological acts, but expressions of our shared humanity.

Reproductive System and ECS-Based Interactions

Clinical Considerations:


Evidence shows that all components of the endocannabinoid system (ECS)—endocannabinoids, receptors, and metabolic enzymes—are present and active in the reproductive system. The ECS plays a regulatory role throughout reproductive physiology, beginning with its presence in semen and extending to critical steps in fertility, such as implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterine wall.



  • Endocannabinoid receptors:

    • CB1 receptors are found in the ovaries, uterus, and testes

    • CB2 receptors are present in the ovarian cortex, medulla, and follicles.



  • Endocannabinoidome (eCBome) receptors:

    • GPR18 is located in the midpiece of human spermatozoa, where it may influence motility.



  • Endocannabinoids:

    • Anandamide (AEA) levels naturally rise at the time of ovulation. Low AEA levels are associated with successful implantation, whereas high levels reduce implantation rates—a biphasic effect that can both help prevent miscarriage and, at the other extreme, act as an early abortifacient. Clinical studies indicate that abnormally high AEA levels are predictive of miscarriage in certain cases. In healthy pregnancies, AEA remains low during early gestation to support embryo implantation and placental development, increasing only later to help trigger labor. When elevated prematurely, AEA can impair uterine receptivity and embryo viability, underscoring its critical role in pregnancy maintenance.




Research increasingly links suboptimal or dysregulated ECS signaling—whether from altered endocannabinoid levels, receptor expression, or enzyme activity—to a range of reproductive disorders in all genders. In female reproductive health, elevated anandamide (AEA) during early pregnancy is strongly associated with implantation failure and miscarriage, while reduced CB1 receptor activity in the uterus has been linked to endometriosis-related infertility. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients often show altered AEA or 2-AG levels, suggesting disrupted ECS-mediated hormonal regulation. In male reproduction, reduced CB1 expression in spermatozoa correlates with impaired motility and reduced fertilization capacity, while abnormal CB2 activity has been implicated in defective spermatogenesis. Conditions such as preeclampsia and preterm labor have also been associated with atypical ECS tone, with studies showing dysregulated AEA and CB1 signaling in the placenta. Collectively, these findings indicate that an optimally tuned ECS is essential for reproductive health, and that deviations—either excessive or deficient signaling—can contribute directly to disease pathophysiology.


Clinical Implications: 


Preclinical and early clinical evidence suggests that targeted ECS modulation can, in some contexts, compensate for dysregulated signaling implicated in reproductive disorders:




  • Endometriosis and pelvic pain: CB2-pathway activation shows anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects in models of endometriosis; eCBome modulators such as β-caryophyllene (dietary CB2 agonist) and PEA (palmitoylethanolamide) have reduced mast-cell–driven inflammation and pelvic pain in observational and small trials, often as adjuncts to standard care.




  • Implantation/early pregnancy biology (theoretical/experimental): Because FAAH governs local anandamide (AEA) tone, selective FAAH up- or down-regulation is a mechanistic lever: higher FAAH → lower AEA (favors implantation); lower FAAH → higher AEA (impairs implantation). This points to a potential, highly timing-sensitive strategy in fertility settings, though clinically validated protocols are not yet established.




  • Male fertility: ECS receptors (CB1/CB2, GPR18/TRPV1) on sperm guide motility/capacitation. Tightly titrated, peripherally biased CB2/eCBome approaches are under investigation to modulate oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling in the male tract; any use should be individualized and evidence-guided.




  • Hormone-linked symptoms: Some phytocannabinoids and eCBome agents (e.g., PEA, β-caryophyllene) may help dysmenorrhea or perimenstrual pain via immune and nociceptive pathways without central psychoactivity.




What’s not recommended (critical safety warning):


A large body of human epidemiology and mechanistic data indicates that THC and CBD exposure during the perinatal window (pre-conception when actively trying to conceive, pregnancy, and lactation) is associated with detrimental risks (e.g., impaired implantation with elevated AEA/THC, fetal growth and neurodevelopmental concerns, altered placental signaling, potential effects on sperm parameters). Major medical organizations advise against cannabinoid use in pregnancy and while breastfeeding. Practically, this means:




  • Avoid THC (CB1-active, biphasic) and CBD (multi-target) during conception attempts, pregnancy, and lactation.




  • Prefer non-cannabinoid eCBome modulators with favorable safety (e.g., PEA, ω-3 fatty acids, lifestyle measures that normalize ECS tone such as sleep, stress reduction, exercise), and use shared decision-making with reproductive specialists.




  • If cannabinoid exposure has occurred, disclose early, monitor closely, and pivot to non-exposure strategies.




Clinical Takeaway:


In reproductive medicine, ECS-targeted care must be condition-specific, timing-sensitive, and safety-first. Peripherally biased, CB2-leaning and eCBome approaches (PEA, β-caryophyllene, anti-inflammatory lifestyle supports) currently offer the most risk-conscious pathway, whereas THC and CBD should be avoided in the perinatal period pending stronger safety data.

Reproductive System Medical Specialists

For gender-typical females, reproductive health care may be provided by obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs), reproductive endocrinologists, fertility specialists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, certified nurse-midwives, pelvic floor physical therapists, and breast health specialists. For gender-typical males, relevant specialists include urologists, andrologists, reproductive endocrinologists, fertility specialists, and prostate health specialists. Intersex individuals may receive care from multidisciplinary teams including endocrinologists, geneticists, gynecologists, urologists, mental health professionals, and sexual health educators. In alternative or integrative care, practitioners may include licensed acupuncturists, naturopathic doctors, herbalists, pelvic floor therapists, sex therapists, yoga therapists, midwives, doulas, and holistic nutritionists.

Also Known As:

Genital system, genitourinary system, reproductive tract, sexual organs, sex organs, urogenital system, reproductive apparatus

Drug Interactions

THC Interaction with Pharmaceutical Drugs

  • Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) can enhance the effects of drugs that cause sedation and depress the central nervous system, such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and alcohol. 
  • THC is metabolized by an inhibitor of several enzymatic liver pathways referred to as cytochrome P450 (aka CYP450). There are more than 50 enzymes belonging to this enzyme family, several of which are responsible for the breakdown of common drugs such as antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline, doxepin, fluvoxamine), antipsychotics (haloperidol, clozapine, Stelazine), beta-blockers (e.g., propranolol), bronchodilators (e.g., theophylline), or blood thinners (e.g., warfarin). Thus, patients taking these medication classes may find that THC increases the concentration and effects of these drugs and the impact duration.
  • Clinical observation (not yet confirmed by clinical trials) suggests no likely interactions with other pharmaceuticals at a total daily dose of up to 20mg THC.

If you are interested in the interaction potential of specific pharmaceuticals with THC, consider visiting these free drug interaction checkers: Drugs.com or DrugBank Online.

CBD Interaction with Pharmaceutical Drugs

  • Cannabidiol (CBD) may alter the action of metabolic enzymes (specific drug-transport mechanisms) and alter interactions with other drugs, some of which may produce therapeutic or adverse effects. For instance, CBD interacts with the enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4 and cytochrome P450 2C19, increasing the bioavailability of anti-epileptic drugs such as clobazam (a benzodiazepine). This makes it possible to achieve the same results at significantly lower dosages, reducing treatment costs and risks of adverse effects. 
  • Groups of drugs affected include anti-epileptics, psychiatric drugs, and drugs affecting metabolic enzymes.
  • Clinical observations (not yet confirmed by clinical trials) suggest no likely interactions with other pharmaceuticals at a total daily dose of up to 100mg CBD.

If you are interested in the interaction potential of specific pharmaceuticals with CBD, consider visiting these free drug interaction checkers: Drugs.com or DrugBank Online.

THC/CBD Interaction with Pharmaceutical Drugs

In general, when using cannabinoid-based therapeutics that contain both THC and CBD consider the ratio between them and weigh the relevant information displayed in the individual THC and CBD Drug Interaction windows accordingly.

If you are interested in the interaction potential of specific pharmaceuticals with both primary cannabinoids and THC/CBD, consider visiting these free drug interaction checkers: Drugs.com or DrugBank Online.

Concerns about Cannabis and Cancer-related Immunotherapies:
Some recent clinical observational studies have suggested that the co-administration of cannabinoid-based therapeutics and immunotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of certain types of cancer has been associated with worse overall survival rates (T. Taha et al., 2019; A. Biedny et al., 2020; G. Bar-Sela et al., 2020).

However, other studies have suggested that the co-commitment use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cannabis-induced no such deleterious effects. More specifically, one trial was conducted on animals resulting in data suggesting that cannabis did not negatively affect the properties of immune checkpoint inhibitors (B. Waissengrin et al., 2023). The same authors compared the previous study results with findings from a cohort of 201 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who received treatment with monotherapy pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment and adjunct cannabis to treat mainly pain and loss of appetite. Their time to tumor progression was 6.1 versus 5.6 months, and overall survival differed between 54.9 versus 23.6 months in cannabis-naïve patients and cannabis-using patients, respectively. However, while numerically different, the authors write that these differences were not statistically significant, leading them to suggest that “These data provide reassurance regarding the absence of a deleterious effect of cannabis in this clinical setting.”

Dosing Considerations

THC Dosage Considerations

  • THC micro dose:  0.1 mg to 0.4 mg
  • THC low dose:  0.5 mg to 5 mg
  • THC medium dose:  6 mg to 20 mg
  • THC high dose:  21 mg to 50+ mg

CBD Dosage Considerations

  • CBD low dose:  0.4 mg to 19 mg
  • CBD medium dose: 20 mg to 99 mg
  • CBD high dose:  100 mg to 800+ mg (upper limits tested ~1,500mg)

Disclaimer
Information on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own licensed physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease. If using a product, you should read carefully all product packaging. If you have or suspect that you have a medical problem, promptly contact your health care provider.

Information on this site is based on scientific studies (human, animal, or in vitro), clinical experience, or traditional usage as cited in each article. The results reported may not necessarily occur in all individuals. For many of the conditions discussed, treatment with prescription or over-the-counter medication is also available. Consult your physician, nutritionally oriented health care practitioner, and/or pharmacist for any health problem and before using any supplements or before making any changes in prescribed medications.